Evolution – Lean Six Sigma Examples

There is a discussion as to whether the future of Quality will progress along an Evolutionary or Revolutionary path.  This will show how Quality has evolved from its origins to is present form.

One observation I would like to share is the convergence of practices into a single collection of knowledge.  ASQ has compiled a QBok (Quality Body of Knowledge) from which practitioners can draw and apply their expertise to help companies achieve new levels of performance, quality, cost, delivery, and assurance.  This convergence is evident in the Lean Six Sigma domain.

In the recent (2009) ASQ Press publication, The Public Health Quality Improvement Handbook by Ron Bialek, Grace Duffy, and John Moran, there is an excellent visual display showing how what we call Lean Six Sigma evolved from various influences.

Lean Six Sigma EvolutionThis document reflects a convergence of practices into a common category.  This viewpoint is corroborated in similar peer-reviewed publications.

Juran is cited as one of the early influences of the Quality profession.  The prolific and pertinent contributions from Juran have been a cornerstone of our profession, and predated the concepts of both Lean and Six Sigma. The passage below is from page 748 of Juran’s Quality Handbook, 6th Edition, and expresses the high-level distinctions between what we term as Lean and Six Sigma. This reference aligns with the diagram above.

“Lean Six Sigma is a combination of both Lean and Six Sigma quality approaches.  The underlying tenet of the Lean approach is efficiency, whereas that of Six Sigma is effectiveness.  The integration of the two approaches provides a balanced approach to quality.  By applying the Lean tools, the processes become stable, constraints and costs to operations are reduced, and the speed is optimized.  Six sigma tools can then be applied to identify key variables in the process, establishing operating ranges, and implement control methods to ensure the problems are corrected.”

The Public Health Quality Improvement Handbook elaborates on the distinctions between Lean and Six Sigma, both in text and visually.

House of LeanThe “House of Lean” captures the key practices and characteristics of Lean, and also establishes the scope and limitations of Lean as a singular approach.  For overall improvement, Lean is not the sole solution, but one of several practices recommended by the authors.

DMAICMore complex improvement initiative require the thoughtful and deliberate diagnostic approaches reflective of a Six Sigma project, as shown in the image of the Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control cycle.  One particular question within the Improve category (What specific activities are necessary to meet the project’s goals) channel directly into the proven, tactical Lean techniques and practices.  In this way, Six Sigma and Lean are not conflicting, but complementary and synergistic activities that when conjoined, enhance and expand their respective effectiveness.

LSS ToolsBy having a unified Body of Knowledge, the respective advantages of Lean and Six Sigma can be combined. Rather than mutually exclusive “either/or” scenarios, the Quality practitioner can select and apply the most appropriate and relevant practices to fit the situation and serve the best interests of the client or organization.  Many of the practices listed in the table above are common (i.e. failure mode and effects analysis, run charts, five whys method) or use common methods (i.e. brainstorming, kaizen).

If this is reflective of the overall Quality profession, then it shows that over time, Quality will continue to evolve to incorporate more complementary practices, thus becoming more robust, relevant, and capable of serving our constituents.

Daniel Zrymiak

About Daniel Zrymiak

I am the ASQ Regional Director for ASQ Region 4, Canada, for the 2015-2016 term. I aspire to collaborate and support with all quality practitioners worldwide, but especially with my fellow Canadian ASQ members and Member Leaders. I am a distinguished professional in Quality, having attained multiple recognitions through the American Society for Quality and International Academy for Quality as a practitioner, leader, author, conference speaker, and influential voice. My professional experience is currently in management consulting, and over the last 20 years I have been engaged in increasingly complex and progressive work in financial services, manufacturing, medical device development, software delivery, telecommunications, resources, and professional services. I have also taught quality and operations management at several post-secondary institutions in the Metro Vancouver area. LinkedIn Profile
This entry was posted in  All, Planning for Quality and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.